On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 10:48:53 -0400 Ted Smith <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 07:11 +0100, Paul O'Malley - gnu's not unix - > wrote: > > Ted Smith wrote: > > >> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009 14:05:01 +0000 > > >> Eric Morey <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >>> I found this post and comments on Vrms to interesting: > > >>> http://blog.nizarus.org/2009/09/are-you-a-100-free-user > > >>> > > >>> Eric... > > > > > nice one ted > > > > > > RMS would certainly not agree with (much of) this output. > > > > some guy called ompaul made a comment about it on the web page > > pointing out that we kind of IGNORE IT COMPLETELY but it seems he > > was wrong.. ;-) > > > > MOST of us ignore it. ;-) > > > Actually, there's a long history (going back to Gobuntu) of trying to > reform VRMS. It's never really taken off. > > All it would take is a small bit of ubuntu-ization to make the Or a not-so-small bit, as it requires patching all the packages which (in)correctly report themselves as free/non-free. > behavior correct in Ubuntu (which uses the FSF designation of > freedom) and gNewSense. Nobody wants to write the perl code, I well.... for some value of 'use' ;) kk > guess. ;-) -- Karl Goetz, (Kamping_Kaiser / VK5FOSS) Debian contributor / gNewSense Maintainer http://www.kgoetz.id.au No, I won't join your social networking group
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
