On Fri, 14 May 2010 22:16:27 +0200 Sam Geeraerts <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Nice. Do you have any plans to contribute this to getgnash.org (to > >> make it available to deltah and hardy users in a repo) or to > >> create a patch for deltah's Builder? > > > > Does the latter means that you want to make Gnash 0.8.7 available > > through deltah-backports repo? > > Lots of users would be very happy with better Flash support. If > someone provides a nice patch to get a recent version of Gnash into > the repo, I'll accept it.
OK, I'll take up Builder this week, hopefully. > > IIUC, the deltah-backports repo is suitable for hardy users also, > > so if I'd go the Builder path, I'd cover the needs of both deltah > > and hardy users. Have I got it right? > > The deltah repos are only meant to be used by deltah users. However, > deltah users could use an Ubuntu Hardy repo at getgnash.org. I don't > know how hard it would be to set up such a repo. Maybe you can work > something out if you talk to Rob in the #gnash channel. He's a busy > man and has already helped us a bunch by setting up the metad repo. > Maybe if he gets some help it will be feasible to set up an > additional repo. I have not much time currently, so I'll stick with Builder right now. Hardy users can get my debs anyway, even without a repo, right? ;-) -- I'm an FSF member -- Help us support software freedom! <http://www.fsf.org/jf?referrer=7253> _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
