Hi, I have been following the recent emails on gnewsense users. As a mere user I doubt if my opinions will be greatly valued but here they are anyway:
I have just installed gNewSense version 3, mainly because updates to the previous version stopped working properly some time ago and the version of evolution supplied with it stopped recognizing links in emails and then stopped downloading and uploading emails to the server. And Yahoo took a dislike to IceCat. I could find no explanation for these occurrences, So I decided to install the new version. Due to a few avoidable mistakes - not helped by some obscurity and unexpected behaviour by the installation program - I managed to lose all of my stored email and contact addresses but my other data was backed up and reloaded OK. Version 3 is great - except for the inclusion of IceWeasel, which people like Yahoo don't want to work with. No problem - install Firefox. But Firefox doesn't have the downloader that I liked to use with IceCat - although there is a much better one that can eventually be found after half a day or so of searching. And my Brother printer won't work anymore. So just get the driver and install that again. Ok, but Xsane is not included with the distro. Easy, it's there on Synaptic, just download it. Except that when downloaded it won't work and gives no information about why. Discover that the scanner driver is separate package - I'm sure it wasn't when I originally installed the printer; I'd have remembered that alright. Install it following the instructions on the Brother website for brscan2 for DCP 350-C on Ubuntu. System says it's installed; Synaptic says it's there; Xsane still can't find it. And I have no idea why. How many weeks of spare time will I need to devote before I am able to simply do all of the normal things that I regularly did with the previous distro? Perhaps here I ought to mention that I started out in the computer industry as a maintenance engineer in 1965 and remained in that field, in various roles, until 2003. So I am not exactly computer illiterate. And I enjoy learning more and sorting out problems. Not only did we not have GUI screens when I started out, we had to punch up machine code on paper tape to get the system started. DOS, when it arrived, was relative child's play. So I don't find using a terminal any sort of challenge in itself. I do find Linux obscure to the point of insanity. So, could you spare a moment from wrangling with each other about abstruse security concerns, which may or may not be of importance, and discussing what should be the basis of the NEXT distro, and apply your considerable intellects to the mundane question of how to get normal mortals to use THIS distro and GNU_Linux in general? I am really anxious that you should succeed; I don't want a world dominated by microsoft. But my experience over several years now is that the sort of people who are the main users of PC's and laptops simply don't have the time or the expertise to cope with the obscure intricacies involved in any sort of change or hiccup in our systems. And it would take the skills of an experienced researcher with unlimited time to discover and decode any sort of support information. Since one of my skills is Technical Documentation I would love to write some simple, understandable descriptions of how the system actually works and what to do when it doesn't. But the available information is verbose, unstructured, and, in the forums, seems mainly to address peculiar requirements, or be rants by hobby purists who can't understand why anyone should want to use GNU-Linux as a simple, reliable tool and probably feel that they ought not to be allowed to do so. But I am struggling to understand the most basic things myself and, although I hope to have many years of productive life left to me, I doubt if I will live long enough to fathom out these mysteries, let alone document them. Obviously a huge amount of skill and care by many people has gone into trying to make the system user-friendly and reliable. My feeling is that there are too many others in the free software community intent on undermining their efforts by adding layers of obscurity and actively trying to keep out 'non-geeks'. I can understand and sympathise with the impatience of the 'Ever onward and upward' developers but, I repeat, the survival of the free software movement probably depends on its mainstream appeal. And that means doing what the user wants, without obscure technical challenges. I doubt if I have made my point adequately but this is the result of another 2 hours of thought devoted to this subject and I can spare no more at present. Josh. _______________________________________________ gNewSense-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnewsense-users
