On Thu, 10 Feb 2005, at 11:57am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > There are insurmountable technical reasons (as far as I'm concerned) for > keeping [email protected], so if anything, we should remove > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reluctantly agreed. Many moons ago, when <[email protected]> was being phased out, we ("we" being those of us around a table at Martha's drinking beer) had these grand plans of creating a mecca of online GNHLUG resources on some hypothetical dedicated server. There was talk of <mail.gnhlug.org> being a temporary thing, and that <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> would be where we eventually got to. I think that was where the alias came from. Obviously, the rest never happened... :-( > I suspect the reason [EMAIL PROTECTED] is appearing in mail messages, is > because someone's MUA is placing it on the address line; I don't believe > its in any mailman definitions anywhere. I had "gnhlug" aliased to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" in my address book, so at least one of the guilty parties was me. I probably typed that in about the same time <zk3.dec.com> died. /me bows head in remembrance. I've updated my address book to point to the longer form. FWIW, I've got an elaborate set of procmail recipes, Pine rules, scripts, and other kludgery that makes sure that when I post to GNHLUG, all my headers are set properly (for a specific definition of "properly"). So the *duplicate* headers weren't coming from me. -- Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do | | not represent the views or policy of any other person or organization. | | All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | _______________________________________________ gnhlug-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss
