Bill Freeman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Kevin D. Clark writes: > ... > > > > How about this recipe? (two, actually) > > (not entirely tested...) > > [ Here Kevin provides a bunch of stuff that looks like line noise. > Not as bad as Teco, but still line noise. ]
IMO, it's bad form to criticize others who are trying to help you for your own inadequacies. Just because you can't read it, or don't like it is no reason to be rude. > Thanks. perl hurts my eyes, but I'll see if I can understand it > well enough to think that I could enhance it to my desired final > level. If you thought *that* was painful, I'm shocked you can look at any kind of source code. That perl was not only crystal clear, but no worse than any python I've ever seen. The only thing in that e-mail resembling line-noise imo, was this: # Bill wants to delete mail that has >15 responses :0w: * ^X-Number-Responses-Seen: \*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\*\* /dev/null And that's not perl, that's procmail, and also clear as day. -- Seeya, Paul -- Key fingerprint = 1660 FECC 5D21 D286 F853 E808 BB07 9239 53F1 28EE A: Yes. > Q: Are you sure? >> A: Because it reverses the logical flow of conversation. >>> Q: Why is top posting annoying in email? _______________________________________________ gnhlug-discuss mailing list gnhlug-discuss@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-discuss/