On Mon, 2 Oct 2000, Jerry Kubeck wrote:
> I had originally set the 4th quarter GNHLUG meeting for Dec 5th (a Tues)
> because I thought it was far enough after Thanksgiving and long enough away
> from the Christmas party rush.
Scheduling conflicts are inevitable. We should expect at least some for
every meeting. (OTOH, scheduling a meeting for 25-DEC would likely be a dumb
idea.)
> However, I have invited a couple of very important people in the Linux
> community to join us ...
Aw, come on, don't leave us hanging -- who?? :-)
Actually, this might be a serious question in disguise. If these people
really are *very* important, we may want to have more lead time to get the
word out, make plans, etc.
> ... and they can't make it until the following Tues (Dec 12th).
I move that the question of the date be proposed to the main discussion
list, as this effects everybody, and everybody is the group best equipped to
answer the question.
> I am making this our GNHLUG Holiday party ...
I thought every GNHLUG meet was a holiday. ;-)
--
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| "Do not meddle in the affairs of sysadmins, for they are quick to anger, |
| and have not need of subtlety." |
