[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > GnhLUG would probably work, but I'd prefer a more descriptive name - > something indicating a core of concerned "stewards" for the group - > but not benign or lethargic.
But this is not what is described on the page about WebChapters. What is described is LUGS and what they do, types of meetings they have, etc., not the structure of the organization or superorganization. It seems to me that "SteeringCommittee" should be a function of the larger "GnhLUG", which is actually listed at the top of the page. This way you get out of having "CentraLUG" get confused with "CentralCommittee". md
