On Thu, 2003-07-24 at 11:50, Mark Gelinas wrote: > All, > > Both were a matter of requiring approval. I did the announce one last > night, > and discuss was done this morning. Ben was not on the approved poster list > for announce, hence its delay. And announce was not an approved poster to > discuss, hence the second delay. I've now rectified both problems, so > things > should be smoother from here on out. > > If any other chairs required posting approval, let me know. > The list currently consists of myself, Bruce, Ben, and Paul.
I can do it too (Bruce told me how), and I also told Dave Long, the MerriLUG coordinator. > > Mark > > On Thu, 24 Jul 2003 11:02:43 -0400 (EDT), Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >> > >> In a message dated: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 23:45:51 EDT > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: > >> > >>> Greetings all, > >> > >> Errrr, you sent this at 23:45 LAST NIGHT? > >> Why am I just now getting it at 10:30a.m. the next day? > >> > >> Sure, I'm willing to account for the fact that I wasn't around > >> between 23:45 and 09:00 this morning, and that my laptop wasn't on. > >> However, fetchmail *just* dropped this into my GNHLUG folder, which > >> tells me that my ISP just received it at 10:26. > >> > >> Looking at the headers, this e-mail left itchy.ntisys.com at 23:45:55 > >> and was received by rogue.codemeta.com. It then was received from > >> rogue by rogue at 06:05:05. So, it sat around on rogue for over 6 > >> hours? Then it was sent from rogue back to rogue at 10:13:48, at which > >> point it left rogue and made it to my ISP at 10:26:00? > >> > >> Bruce, I think your drain might be a little clogged :) > > > > It was "clogged" due to waiting approval, which I *think* I did sometime > > this morning. All messages to the announce list must be approved - and > > I'm > > one of the approvers. (Maybe Ben should be made one too!) > > > > One of the "clogging" contributors may be that if sendmail isn't able to > > immediately connect to a recipient's SMTP server, then the message goes > > back in the queue and is retried "later" - I don't remember when that > > "later" is - but I seem to remember its a matter of hours. > > > > Beer Disclaimer: My memory is still somewhat foggy - I'm not sure if I > > approved it last night or this morning - if anyone has evidence contrary > > to the above statements, then I'm inclinded to believe them. But please > > let me know so I can schedule time to sort though the log files and put > > this "mail is slow" daemon to rest. > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Gnhlug-org mailing list > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org > > > > -- Rob Lembree <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Gnhlug-org mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org
