As a list moderator, I can say that anything that will reduce the amount of time purging spam would be a good thing.
Make sure this change of policy gets mentioned on all the lists, so that subscribers are aware. Mark On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 11:11:07 -0400, Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ben Scott wrote: |On 10/25/05, Bruce Dawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | |>We have "Send mail to poster when their posting is held for approval?" |>set to "yes" for most of our mailing lists. I am changing this to "no" ... | | | Assuming our current rev of Mailman supports it, I would think, |given the current spam climate, that the best thing to do would be to |silently discard all mail from addresses not on the member list. I |realize that's harsher then GNHLUG lists have historically operated, |but it's standard practice on many other lists. And we really don't |have the resources (people or computer) to do otherwise. Tough times |and all that. | |-- Ben "Bloody vikings" Scott Lets start with this, and if the moderators revolt, then we can become more of a "bloody viking". (We do still have moderators don't we - they've been omniously quiet about this) - --Bruce -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDXksL/TBScWXa5IgRAuTRAJ0S5ywmIpQmKH93Edyl6U2ITHQtSACfcK3j tDrul6mOIeqx1HbfEFRwTHo= =3Ll2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ gnhlug-org mailing list gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org
-- Using Opera's revolutionary e-mail client: http://www.opera.com/mail/ _______________________________________________ gnhlug-org mailing list gnhlug-org@mail.gnhlug.org http://mail.gnhlug.org/mailman/listinfo/gnhlug-org