Ferenc Tamas Gyurcsan wrote:
>
> >Is '-l' supposed to work on Linux? It is an invalid option on RedHat 5.2
Huh?
ls -l has worked for me on every version of Linux and Unix I have ever used. It does
not make any sense that 'ls -l' does not work. It sounds like the ls command is
incorrectly aliased. The -l option has been part of the ls command forever.
--
--
Gerald Feldman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Boston Computer Solutions and Consulting
ICQ#156300
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
