In a message dated: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 06:52:05 EST
Derek Martin said:
>For that reason, I'd like to ask that the reply-to field be removed, and
>the list's reply behavior returned to the original `reply to sender'
>behavior. While I don't think Paul would object TOO strenuously to me
>calling him impatient in front of all of our GNHLUG subscribers, I'm
>positive that he wouldn't mind in the context it was intended, and I'd
>prefer not to be put in the position of having to appologize publicly
>for doing so. [ Sorry Paul! :) ]
Me? Impatient? Who woulda thunk? ;)
Though I too agree with your request. I've been bitten by it myself when I
know I've explicitly inteded to reply-to-sender, not all.
>I know I'm not the only one who would like to see this reply-to behavior
>go away... I've heard others comment on it as well, both off-list to me
>personally and in person, at a recent meeting. I also think it would
>help improve the S/N ratio somewhat.
Ditto.
--
Seeya,
Paul
----
Doing something stupid always costs less (up front) than doing
something intelligent.
Bean counters are *always* wrong!
A conclusion is simply the place where you got tired of thinking.
If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right!
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
