Benjamin Scott says that those of us who don't want to reply to the
list by default ought to configure our MUA's to ignore Reply-To
headers.
I suppose for me that's true. I'm comfortable enough with
elisp to arrange for rmail in emacs to only ignore the Reply-To header
if it specifies [EMAIL PROTECTED] But for most folks I suspect that
they would wind up having to forgo the truly useful purpose of
Reply-to: Correctly responding to folks who, for any of a variety of
reasons, need to receive mail at an account different from their
apparent sender address.
Bill
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL question] Benjamin Scott
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL question] Derek Martin
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL questio... Benjamin Scott
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL que... Derek Martin
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL questio... Jeffry Smith
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL questio... Rodent of Unusual Size
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL que... Derek Martin
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL question] Bill Freeman
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL questio... Benjamin Scott
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL question] Paul Lussier
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL question] Karl J. Runge
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL questio... Kenneth E. Lussier
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL que... Derek Martin
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL... Chuck MacKinnon
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL... Bob Bell
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: ... Derek Martin
- RE: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL que... Jerry Eckert
- Re: Reply addresses [was Re: MySQL... Derek Martin
