On 4 Apr 2000, Adam Johnson wrote:
> Well, you'd have to set a similar route up on the Windows box as well,
> otherwise the packets will get there, but not return.
Doh! I knew I was too tired to be trying network things when I wrote that.
Yah, add the route on the 'doze box, and everything is peachy.
> I don't think it would matter, but you might want to use the network
> address of 192.168.10.0 instead of 192.168.10.1 in the route add -net line
> (makes it clearer)
Actually, I did do that, I just transcribed it wrong. See above about being
tired. :-)
--
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| "Knowledge is always of value, and the value is never predictable. What |
| will come of it, we cannot know." -- Larry Niven |
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
