At 11:38 AM 4/14/2000 , Paul Lussier wrote:
wait a min - wasn't the first version based of UNIX code anyway?
>In a message dated: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 09:20:51 EDT
>Bayard Coolidge USG ZKO3-3/S20 said:
>
> >
> >Niall Kavanagh, [EMAIL PROTECTED] forwarded an article that said, in part:
> >
> >>>> Most of these systems are UNIX-based.
> >>>> The UNIX-based duplication systems used in manufacturing are impervious
> >
> >Ayuh - using 'dd' tends to work nicely that way !!
>
>Of course, if the original machine that the master was created on was
>infected, then 'dd' et al. will just continue to propagate the issue.
>--
>Seeya,
>Paul
>----
> "I always explain our company via interpretive dance.
> I meet lots of interesting people that way."
> Niall Kavanagh, 10 April, 2000
>
> If you're not having fun, you're not doing it right!
>
>
>
>**********************************************************
>To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
>*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
>unsubscribe gnhlug
>**********************************************************
Kurth Bemis
Senior Unix/Linux Network/Server Administrator, USAExpress.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.usaexpress.net/kurth
ICQ UIN - 6624050
Callsign - N1TYW
PGP Key Available - ask
Fight Weak Encryption! Donate Your Wasted CPU Cycles To distributed.net.
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
