Did I miss that part of this discussion where somebody explained why it's NECESSARY for the stack to be executable in the first place? Shouldn't the burden be on those who WANT the stack to be executable to persuade us that it's a Good Thing? ********************************************************** To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the *body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter: unsubscribe gnhlug **********************************************************
- Re: ping and SUID (was: Derek's been hacked) Kevin D. Clark
- Re: ping and SUID (was: Derek's been hacked) Karl J. Runge
- RE: ping and SUID (was: Derek's been hacked) Jerry Eckert
- RE: ping and SUID (was: Derek's been hacked) Benjamin Scott
- RE: ping and SUID (was: Derek's been hacked... Jerry Eckert
- RE: ping and SUID (was: Derek's been ha... Jamie Blondin
- RE: ping and SUID (was: Derek's be... Derek Martin
- RE: ping and SUID (was: Derek'... Jamie Blondin
- RE: ping and SUID (was: Derek's been hacked) Derek Martin
- Re: ping and SUID (was: Derek's been hacked) Karl J. Runge
- Re: ping and SUID (was: Derek's been hacked) Michael O'Donnell
- Re: ping and SUID (was: Derek's been hacked) Benjamin Scott
- Re: ping and SUID (was: Derek's been hacked) Bobnhlinux
- Re: ping and SUID (was: Derek's been hacked) Jeffry Smith
