On Wed, 21 Jun 2000, Niall Kavanagh wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Jeffry Smith wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 20 Jun 2000, Benjamin Scott wrote:
> >
> > > Some are frameworks to support execution of programs that generate web
> > > content. (CGI, ASP) Those programs may be scripts.
> >
> > And the framework for Java is Enterprise Java Beans (EJB), and thus
> > is a framework that supports one language (but which could support
> > others that support the interfaces, i.e.jpython), although the new
> > Corba Container spec is based on EJB. IBM also has something similar
> > to EJB (I understand they wrote most of the EJB spec for Sun), but
> > isn't "certified" since they disagree with Sun on licensing issues.
> > Politics is wonderful.
> >
>
> Saying ASP and EJB are both frameworks is indeed correct, but they are
> frameworks in totally different spaces. If you're itching for a Win32
> specific EJB-like framework for distributed applications, try
> DCOM/COM+/ATL/MSMQ (or more likely some combination <g>).
>
> Re: the IBM mention.... do you mean WebSphere? Or do they have their own
> EJB implementation?
>
WebSphere Components:
http://www-4.ibm.com/software/webservers/components/componentsrelease.html
I'd have to hunt some more on the spat between IBM & Sun, it deals
with the cost Sun is charging for "certification," given how much IBM
contributed to the design of EJB
jeff
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeffry Smith Technical Sales Consultant Mission Critical Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] phone:603.930.9379 fax:978.446.9470
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Thought for today: Neutrinos have bad breadth.
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
