Bill Freeman said:
> . Also, since
> I proprosed regular incremental backups that were all increments from
> the last full backup, rather than just changes from the last
> incremental, the full backup would have to fail to keep me from
> getting back to fairly recent.
Remember also to test those backups with an occasional restore! (Remember -
the purpose of backup is to be able to restore. I know of one site that had
some big problems when it turned out one tape in a backup set was defective,
but obviously writable enough not to cause errors - oops, no data.
>
> > ..., disgruntled worker (deletes everything), ...
>
> That would be me. More scary is the PHB (the other paid
> employee deciding to do something on his own.
>
Ah yes, the human factor. If only we could get rid of those pesky things, it
would make us IT folks' jobs a lot easier ;-)
jeff
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeffry Smith Technical Sales Consultant Mission Critical Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] phone:603.930.9739 fax:978.446.9470
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thought for today: hungry puppy n.
Syn. slopsucker.
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
