Benjamin Scott said:
>
> Someone (I won't say who because I don't want to get Jeff Smith in trouble)
> posted a rant a couple weeks ago about how MS-friendly InfoWorld magazine (and
> friends) were.
who, me?
>Apparently, they have found out that dancing with the devil is
> a dangerous game:
>
> http://www.infoworld.com/articles/op/xml/01/03/05/010305opcringely.xml
>
> <grin>
Or at least their columnists ;-)
For other interesting words of wisdom from the Tolly Group:
http://www.tolly.com/kt/nww/columns/20000904W2K.html
Some of the best from that link:
Microsoft's claims notwithstanding, initial research into Win
2000's network capabilities by Tolly Research (a sister
organization) seems to indicate that whatever inherent basic
reliability exists, it drops significantly if you actually want to
use Win 2000 to communicate with another device.
Many months of research show the
Microsoft solution to be poorly conceived, documented and
implemented. Sometimes it works, sometimes it doesn't -
hardly ideal for "always-on" applications.
Another link:
http://www.tolly.com/archives/newsdesk/200005W2N.htm
jeff
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Jeffry Smith Technical Sales Consultant Mission Critical Linux
[EMAIL PROTECTED] phone:603.930.9739 fax:978.446.9470
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Thought for today: RETI v.
Syn. RTI
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
