[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I'm just not seeing this problem in the Windows space and this is making
> it sound like running Linux on the Internet is a very risky proposition
> and certainly a poor choice compared to Windows.
>
What this means is, contrary to the FUD,
***Linux is easier to use than windows.***
Crackers can crack any box, at current levels of security.
It seems to be harder for them to do things with windows,
once they get there.
Of course, once Linux security is tightened, it will be harder for
crackers to get in, & they will start having more fun with the
Windows 2000 security holes. Or, is that Windows with
2000 security holes?
Bob Sparks
Never attribute to malice, that which can be explained by stupidity.
Never attribute to stupidity, that which can be explained by lack of
information.
**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************
