On Tue, Oct 02, 2001 at 12:40:23PM -0400, Rich C wrote:
> > Secondly because in the vast majority of cases, even when
> > the attacks succeed, the real damage is almost nonexistant.
> 
> Oh really? Tell that to the guy across the hall from me who has had to
> rebuild all of his Win2k/IIS servers because Nimda damaged them beyond
> repair. I myself did a virus cleanup job over there, charging as much as a
> new computer would have cost (and my rates are REALLY CHEAP!) That's one new
> computer they won't be able to afford this year.

Rich, as counterevidence of my statement, you point to one of the
examples of exceptions that I specifically stated existed.  Nimda is
one of the few exceptions, and as I said it probably could qualify as
terrorism owing to the scale of the attack and the damage it caused.
The only problem is that most acts of terrorism have a specific
target, and it's difficult to say who the target of Nimda was.  I
suppose you could say it was Microsoft...

My systems are "attacked" at least a dozen times a day (and usually
much more than that), using DoJ's definitions, and the vast majority
of these attacks are pretty harmless.  Virtually all of them are
rendered harmless by the basic dilligence that is the responsibility
of all sysadmins who manage a publicly accessible computer.  No, that
does not excuse the attackers, but it's just the same as putting
proper working locks on the doors of your home.  Few people will be
sympathetic to your cause if all your stuff gets stolen and you had no
locks.

And with those very few exceptions, they're still not tantamount to
terrorism, and hardly worthy of life in prison.

I am still unfailingly bewildered by the overwhelming lack of effort
to make Microsoft take responsibility for these problems.  Ultimately,
it's their utterly crappy software and their unwillingness to
re-examine their (lack of a) security model that allowed these attacks
to be successful.

-- 
---------------------------------------------------
Derek Martin          |   Unix/Linux geek
[EMAIL PROTECTED]    |   GnuPG Key ID: 0x81CFE75D
Retrieve my public key at http://pgp.mit.edu


**********************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with the following text in the
*body* (*not* the subject line) of the letter:
unsubscribe gnhlug
**********************************************************

Reply via email to