On Mon, 26 Nov 2001, Ken Ambrose wrote: > When one uses "ls" in RH, it has the --color alias set, something that I > normally love. However, the --color feature has one *REALLY* annoying > thing. For example, files with +x set show up in green. Handy for > executables. Well, so do files that end in ".sh" -- EVEN IF their > executable bits aren't set.
Yet another case of the vendor "doing you a favor" that did not really work out. Of course, if you follow this complaint to the logical conclusion, all the Linux distributions would have to be reduced to a collection of unconfigured source packages. The vendors have to do *something*, and for any given option, there has to be a default. Where do we draw the line? -- Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not | | necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or | | organization. All information is provided without warranty of any kind. | ***************************************************************** To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body. *****************************************************************
