In a message dated: Tue, 18 Dec 2001 07:09:59 PST
Ken Ambrose said:
>Hey, Paul: I hadn't heard about it before, but, now that I have, I admit
>that I'm interested. I don't know if I speak for others on here, but one
>of the questions that would define my level of interest is: any idea how
>"ready for prime-time" LVS is, yet? In principle, it sounds like an ideal
>way to have high-availability for (a|my) company, but not if it's still
>going through growing pains. I see it's at .9.8, which sounds promising:
>do you have any further info?
It's quite usable depending upon what you want to do with it. We've
(MCLX) put a lot of effort into making it better and are using it for
a variety of things. We actually advertise using it in a 3-tiered
high-availability configuration, and will support customers who opt
to use it (obviously they need to purchase a support contract :)
--
Seeya,
Paul
----
God Bless America!
...we don't need to be perfect to be the best around,
and we never stop trying to be better.
Tom Clancy, The Bear and The Dragon
*****************************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body.
*****************************************************************
