Actually, there is...but my explanation would probably not be very clear (not to 
mention probably embarrassing).

I deal with this mostly from the point of view of the WebSphere Application Servers 
and head up the performance monitoring drive. I'll ask my partner-in-crime who's 
running w/ the Apache issue to write me up a little note about the problem and I'll 
pass it on.

-Lawrence

-----Original Message-----
From: Benjamin Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 10:19 AM
To: Greater NH Linux Users' Group
Subject: RE: Apache configuration question


On Mon, 29 Apr 2002, at 10:11am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Incorrect.  Apache 1.3 is always and immutably single-threaded,
>> except on Windows.
>
> Well, it looks like Ken nailed our pretty well.  Time to talk to the
> powers-that-be to bring us up to date on our version.

  Whoa.  What are you trying to accomplish here?  I am getting the
impression that you are operating under the assumption that you need
multi-threaded operation for some reason.  Is that impression correct?  
Because the assumption may not be.  Apache does quite well as a
single-threaded, multi-process server.  Is there a reason you want
threading?

-- 
Ben Scott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| The opinions expressed in this message are those of the author and do not |
| necessarily represent the views or policy of any other person, entity or  |
| organization.  All information is provided without warranty of any kind.  |


*****************************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body.
*****************************************************************

*****************************************************************
To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body.
*****************************************************************

Reply via email to