On Tue, 21 May 2002, Richard Soule wrote: > To me that is a HUGE difference. The more I think about this the more > it becomes apparent that open source should be required for all gov't > software [ except mine, of course :) ].
Excellent point - one I hadn't considered. So that doesn't really mean RH would say the "same" thing, but still, I think that Microsoft saying their stuff isn't secure doesn't mean a whole hell of a lot. I don't think much will be won on that front unless it's as a "If I had just ONE MORE reason to go with Linux, I would" kind of thing. Ben -- Judge not the horse by his saddle. ***************************************************************** To unsubscribe from this list, send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with the text 'unsubscribe gnhlug' in the message body. *****************************************************************
