Olaf Jan Schmidt, le Fri 04 Aug 2006 12:06:57 +0200, a écrit : > [ Samuel Thibault ] > > I'm just wondering: can't any corba implementation (other than ORBit, > > omniORB or TAO for instance) be used by Qt instead ? > > I don't know. KDE stopped using CORBA because the people dealing found it too > complicated to work with. Our evaluation is that the effort to do this would > certainly be greater than using D-Bus.
But less than using ORBit (and bare with bonobo dependency), right? That might meet everyone's need: keep at-spi in a CORBA protocol, so that gnome and Qt accessibility work together, but avoid ORBit dependencies. > It would also be no solution for the libbonobo dependency. I don't understand this. Doesn't Qt using another CORBA implementation would let it be free from bonobo? Samuel _______________________________________________ Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel
