[ Steve Lee, Fr., 4. Mai. 2007 ] > > a) move AT-SPI to D-Bus > > b) use IA2 on top of D-Bus (even under Linux) > > 1) Doesn't that mean that AT vendors have to re-code to use the D-Bus > 'transport'?
Yes, on Linux. I see no other technical solution for making non-Gtk/non-Java applications accessible. But the changes can be small if done right. > 2) On windows we don't want to port D-bus as that's another layer and > anyway overlaps with COM to which MSAA/IA2 are tightly bound. I agree. > > Yes, a GAIL to implement IA2-and- > > MSAA over COM for Gtk on Windows would be great. Gtk applications on > > Windows could then be accessible via JAWS and other ATs. > > Actually isn't it the atk bridge (libatk-bridge) that needs to be > replaced? I agree. Olaf _______________________________________________ Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel
