Hello Brian,

First of all, thanks for your reply.


At 9:57 AM -0500 9/27/07, Brian Cameron wrote:
>>Instead of making GDM launch a specific program, it could indicate 
>>what Assistive Technology to launch.
>>GDM would for example only tell to start the onscreen keyboard, 
>>leaving it to a sort of "Preferred Application"-Setting to decide 
>>whether to start gok, onboard, xvkb,...
>
>One complication about this approach is that the GDM user does not have
>currently use GConf where I think these settings are currently set.  I
>suppose we could make GDM depend on GConf to get these settings, but
>is it worth adding a new dependency for this?  The new D-Bus version
>of GDM does use GConf, so perhaps this is a moot question.  :)  But
>it probably makes sense to do this work in the D-Bus branch rather
>than bothering to add GConf as a dependency in the current stable
>version.

Sorry if I did not say it explicitely in my previous email: my idea, 
if sensible, was aimed for the new D-Bus branch. I agree with you 
that it does not make sense to introduce completely new features to 
the current stable branch as it is going to be phased out in a not to 
distant future.



>Well, GDM would need to have a program that talks to GConf to figure
>out what the preferred applications are.  The GDM GUI programs could
>either do this directly, or there could be a helper program that the
>GUI programs talk to in order to launch such programs.

I think that these GUI programms wwwwshould not only be able read the 
preferred applications setting, it should also be able to change the 
settings.



>>>If you also are interested in enhancing GDM to launch AT programs
>>>in more novel ways (e.g. by directly integrating them into GDM), then
>>>we should discuss.
>>
>>I looked for any standards on the Internet about how the different 
>>Assistive Technologies should be started, but I was not able to 
>>find something really useful yet. Now I wonder if any standards 
>>exists, and if they do exist, whether they are Desktop or even OS 
>>independent.
>
>I think historically, only gnopernicus, dasher, orca and GOK have
>existed.  I believe orca has pretty much replaced gnopernicus.  So
>there hasn't been much overlap until now that we have onscreen.

In other words, if there is not much to choose from, a preferred 
applications setting will not make much sense...

Anyway, as you said, first the effort should go into enabling 
Assistive Technology in the new branch.


Have a nice day.

Francesco
_______________________________________________
Gnome-accessibility-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-devel

Reply via email to