Hi, Orca is much better in my opinion mainly because it is scriptable, allowing scripts to be writen to control how orca speaks and acts in different environments. Gnopernicus does not do this. From my experience, orca works somewhat ok with firefox, and works with gaim better do to a special script writen to read incoming messages which some people have problems with though others may not. Orca is all about customization, gnopernicus is more or less wysiwyg. Gnopernicus works with gaim, but in older versions then 1.0 you will need to export the gtk modules.
export gtk_MODULES=gail:atk-bridge Orca works with gaim right out of the box. gnopernicus does not work well, or at all in my situation with firefox. though make sure you enable the caret naviagation in FF when using either gnopernicus or orca. you can read more about orca at http://orca.gnome.org HTH, Cody----- Original Message ----- From: "Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, July 06, 2006 10:54 AM Subject: Gnopernicus vs Orca > Hello all, > Maybe someone on this list can tell me what is better with Orca compared > with Gnopernicus. Can I get better access with Orca when it comes to > reviewing the screen with the virtual focus or simular? > Many thanks, > Christian > > _______________________________________________ > gnome-accessibility-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list _______________________________________________ gnome-accessibility-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
