Hi, Sanne is absolutely right that the other thread is for discussion about the preconference, so I'm answering the questions related to our project in this new thread.
Samuel Thibault: > Yes, it's a separate tool but it depends on liblouis to do all the > transcription. | How different is it from the "dots" application? Dunno, because sincerely we didn't know of this application. I'll tell Onirica to have a look on it, so that they can re-use as much code as possible. This includes to take over the development of this application. > easy addition of new tables | New liblouis tables? Yes, for example for basque or galician, in case there are not any for them. > and the ability to be called by OpenOffice.org to do on-the-fly > transcriptions. | That, however, is new, but it seems to me like something that would be | independant from the main tool. We want it to be integrated. | I'm not saying your project is not good. I'm trying to make sure it | integrates with existing solutions, and not re-do work that already | exists. Of course your input is greatly appreciated and I hope Onirica will join this conversation so that you can suggest them new ways to improve this application, be it completely anew or further development of dots. Matteo Vescosi: Yes, WARP is planning to use pressage to do the text prediction.
_______________________________________________ gnome-accessibility-list mailing list gnome-accessibility-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-accessibility-list
