ons, 02,.03.2005 kl. 11.05 -0500, skrev Luis Villa: >I'd be happier with a tracker bug; a memory keyword will be unused >again in 6-12 months. >Luis > You really think this is a problem that will be solved once and for all during the next cycle or two? :-)
Cheers Kjartan > >On Wed, 02 Mar 2005 00:32:22 -0500, David Malcolm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm seeing lots of great fixes for memory consumption, and some >> organisation via the wiki... >> >> Should we have a memory consumption keyword in Bugzilla? I looked but >> couldn't see one. Would allow nifty BZ queries... (did I miss a tracker >> bug?) >> >> Probably just "memory", though "eats_all_my_ram", or >> "memory_footprint" (to go with the Gnome logo) appeal to me. Though >> "memory" would save typing. >> >> (I don't think confusion with "perf" and "purify" would be likely) >> >> Dave Malcolm >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Gnome-bugsquad mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad >> >_______________________________________________ >Gnome-bugsquad mailing list >[email protected] >http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad _______________________________________________ Gnome-bugsquad mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad
