On Mon, May 09, 2005 at 09:50:33AM -0600, Elijah Newren wrote: > On 5/9/05, JP Rosevear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Mon, 2005-05-09 at 20:05 +0530, Harish Krishnaswamy wrote: > > > During the irc meeting last week, we discussed the pros and cons of > > > deprecating evolution-patches and using bugzilla as the treasure > > > bag for patches. [..] > > > Fresh thoughts, any ? > > > > Yes. The ideal way might be to use bugzilla for patches and see if we > > could get automated mails to e-p containing the bug number, product, > > component and summary (and a link) if a patch is attachment is set on a > > bug. > > Sounds somewhat similar to the automated patch-nagging we were > planning on doing (though that was more aimed at patches that had been > in bugzilla for a long time without being reviewed, but I'm sure the > same code could be used to do something like this). I think this > sounds reasonable.
A totally custom message for patches is not that easy (unfortunately). But the bugmail about the attachment contains everything that is needed. It has product/component/version in the body of the mail, summary of the patch + additional comment if provided. Two suggestions: 1. Add evolution-patches as a user to bugzilla.gnome.org. Let that watch [EMAIL PROTECTED] and whatever other products are needed. For evolution-patches every email option should be disabled except 'New Attachments are added'. 2. Do same as above, but hack (it will be a hack) processmail so that 'New Attachments' for the evolution-patches means attachment has 'patch' flag set. (non-patches are not mailed) -- Regards, Olav _______________________________________________ Gnome-bugsquad mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad
