Am Dienstag, den 26.07.2005, 16:29 -0600 schrieb Elijah Newren: > > stable and development branch available and putting older reports all under > > e.g. 2.8.x ? > Then we have to constantly migrate bugs from a bunch of version into a > single version and nuke a the old ones. Ain't gonna happen, we're Correct. Good point if that really involves lots of work and/or evil hacking.
> > time span: 1.1.2000 -> 1.1.2002 > > all non-resolved bugs, any cvs tag > > Out of curiosity, what do you mean by "any cvs tag". I wanted to try > it out as well but I don't know what you searched on. WEll, any product with any cvs tag ... "Current CVS","CVS","cvs","cvs(HEAD)","CVS(HEAD)","CVS(head)"... you name it. > Interesting...I would have expected more, though perhaps those bugs > are just more likely to get resolved at some point. Or are obsolete/invalid/already resolved. I'd say possible BudDay candidates :) -- Christian Kirbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ Gnome-bugsquad mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad
