On Sat, 2006-02-11 at 19:49 -0700, Elijah Newren wrote: > I consider the new vs. unconfirmed > suckiness that currently exists to be a temporary situation. One that > has lasted many years, granted, but one that will be killed sooner or > later. And then my long diatribe on not confirming bugs will be > totally obsolete and wrong. At long last. :-) >
If that is the case, I find it surprising that you would discourage new bugsquad members from confirming bugs. > > I think the idea of developers having only to look at confirmed bugs is > > definitely attractive, and could perhaps become a goal of the bugsquad. > > I do realize that this would be a goal and not something that could > > actually be acheived overnight. > > > > It is also reliant on the bugsquad being knowledgeable enough to > > distinguish between "real" bugs where the bugs are highly technical. > > It also depends on the ability to have developers not be emailed for > unconfirmed bugs, an ability we don't yet have. I think that's the > biggest obstacle. I think we have sufficient manpower to push bugs > from unconfirmed to new in such a case where developers don't see the > unconfirmed bugs. I'd like to help if I can. _______________________________________________ Gnome-bugsquad mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad
