On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 04:45:21 +0100, Andre Klapper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> http://live.gnome.org/Bugsquad/DirectiveDiscussion :
> "NEEDINFO:
> Reports should be set to NEEDINFO when there is essential information
> missing or a developer has some unanswered questions."
>
> this is still as vague at it is currently. :-/

It is not supposed to be a new stock answer. In fact, it is kind of  
obsolete.


> i was used to wait 30 days before closing them. perhaps we should set
> this to 45 days (if there aren't any dups of course), to be a bit more
> safe?
> opinions?

sounds good to me.


regarding the 'gentlewomen' agreement, I pledge for a recommendation to  
leave the closure
to the original triager, unless the report has obviously been forgotten.


-- 
Christian Kirbach
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+49 176 23861781
_______________________________________________
Gnome-bugsquad mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad

Reply via email to