Hey, On 11/28/07, Bruno Boaventura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Nov 28, 2007 2:03 PM, Gil Forcada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I was wondering if it will be useful to have a blocker named GNOME 2.22 > > > in bugzilla and the same for every app in GNOME and enter (or marked as > > > a dependency) of the first one, finally every feature planned in the > > > RoadMap should be filled and marked as a dependency for the per-app > > > blocker > > > > > > for what? just to keep track, since bugzilla marks the resolved bugs, a > > > brief look at the global blocker will tell us if the GNOME 2.22 global > > > RoadMap (or per-app) is going well :) > > I think the roadmaps are not mandatory, they may not be met by some > modules, thus we can't block the release because of roadmaps. > > What are other bugsquaders' opinions?
I would say that we shouldn't block but we could create bugs for roadmap points so people can go there and comment or maybe take the bug and do it. I confess I'm a bit ignorant of how the Roadmap Gang works now, but it would be a good idea to have a correspondence between bugzilla bugs and planned features. Greetings! _______________________________________________ Gnome-bugsquad mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad
