On Mon, Aug 25, 2008 at 07:53:33AM -0400, Andrew Conkling wrote: > This message wasn't intended to discuss GNOME's Bugzilla but I brought that > up. Apparently there has been some discussion about this, just wondering > what it was and whether there'd be any chance of getting this (and I guess > upgrading to Bugzilla 3).
I forgot the details of the GUADEC. In general: * I don't like pushing bugreports as-is upstream. Filing a good bugreport takes work. You need to include only the relevant information. If that isn't done, then the amount of time it takes stays the same, except that it is now with the developer. That is really bad. * Pushing comments back and forth automatically: I fear the same could happen. E.g. the 'why isn't this fixed'? Regarding Bugzilla 3: * lack of time * want to push some things upstream that upstream doesn't want upstream (attachment statuses) > Working both with Ubuntu's Launchpad and GNOME's Bugzilla, I can say that > the current processes to relate bugs, to push them upstream, and just to > manage them are quite tedious. What do you mean exactly? Which parts? > Olav, copying you as I hear you're the Bugzilla maintainer. Bugzilla maintainer address is [EMAIL PROTECTED] I prefer that so past maintainers, inactive and future maintainers have all discussions available/archived. I looked at the patch for 3.2, and it includes a lot of changes that shouldn't be in there. It basically removed a lot of documentation and also changes some of the documentation (of Bugzilla). Did not check further than that. -- Regards, Olav _______________________________________________ Gnome-bugsquad mailing list Gnome-bugsquad@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad