I've answered this already on IRC, still pasting it here for the records. Note that for those that I did not comment on I totally agree.
On Wed, 2011-11-30 at 03:27 +0000, kbenjamin Coplon wrote: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=505995 obsolete can you elaborate? did you retest it? > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=514106 fixed_in_stable > (see it's duplicate > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=554071#c4) yes, perfect. please go ahead and close it, mentioning that comment 4 in the other report, and asking the reporter to leave a comment if it's still an issue in a recent version of brasero > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=578180 not_gnome (looks > like a Ubuntu patch also version 2.26.0) I'd add a comment explaining that we **assume** as per comment 2 that it's an ubuntu-specific issue. so NOTGNOME is fine, but also ask if it's still an issue in recent versions, just to be sure. > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=348316 "new" version 3.2x > GNOME version "unversioned enhancement" os "all" importance "normal > ,enhancement" if you tested that this still doesn't exist in 3.2, all your proposed changes sound good. I'd keep "OS = Linux" though, it's not really important here. > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=389476 "new" > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438850 "new" UE version > unspecified os all > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=584893 "new" version unspecified I'd also reset the old Target Milestone to --- > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=438852 "new" os all > milestone na GNOME ver UE > what do you think so far? Looks good! Thanks! andre -- mailto:[email protected] | failed http://blogs.gnome.org/aklapper | http://www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gnome-bugsquad mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-bugsquad
