2005/9/15, Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Thu, 2005-09-08 at 10:23 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > > > I'm going to release 2.0 soon, so please if you have something that > > > needs to go in, let me know so that I wait till you commit it > > > > Have you decided that this should not be dealt with?: > > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gnome-db-list/2005-August/msg00031.html > > > > It would be very difficult to fix it later without breaking applications > > that depend on the broken behaviour. > > > for #310226, I think guchar is the best thing, since binary is composed > of bytes. So, could you please resend your patch using guchar?
I'll take care of that bug because I've already made some local modifications to the gda_value_[gs]et_binary() functions. _______________________________________________ gnome-db-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
