I introduced gda_column_index (originally called GdaDataModelColumnIndexAttributes) a couple of months ago. Therefore I am just curious about the comment above . Why is (was) gda_column_index_free a bad idea while gda_column_free for instance is not? Probably not quiet awake here, but just to prevent that I will be making similar mistakes in the future.> > GdaColumnIndex: > - This is a reference-counted object, but it also has a > gda_column_index_free() function. When would/could this be > used? I'm pretty sure that it should be removed. It does a > g_free() instead of a g_object_unref(). Done, I've removed it as it was a bad idea to have such a harmfull function!
Thanks,
Bas.
_______________________________________________ gnome-db-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
