On Thu, 2006-09-14 at 10:49 -0500, Daniel Espinosa wrote: > > > 2006/9/14, Neil Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Rodrigo Moya wrote: > >>> I suggest that you use this version and not the current > and obsolete > >>> version. > >> Sorry, completely unrealistic. I'm not willing to use > unpackaged and > >> AFAICT unreliable code. > >> > > libgda 1.9.10x are mostly betas for the upcoming 2.0, so > using them you > > invest in time not needed later to port your application to > the new > > API :-) > > OK, that's reassuring. > > Most of the developers helping in gda/gnome-db are working in projects > using gda and/or gnome-db, and I think they are changing much code any > time the API changes. I think we need to make stable de API ASAP, in > order to create examples, polish bindings, create the documentation > and help the other projects in his work. > yes, that's the idea, but the new API needs first to be polished. As soon as we are all happy, we will freeze the branch and release the final stable 2.0 after a time for beta.
> -- Rodrigo Moya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ gnome-db-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
