On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 16:15 +0100, Vivien Malerba wrote: > > > > Surely, we _always_ need the database name, whatever provider we > are > > > > using. So that can be a parameter to prepare_create_database()? > > > > > > > > I'm also surprised that both prepare_create_database() and > > > > perform_create_database() take the provider name. Surely that > should > > > be > > > > decided since calling prepare_create_database(). > > > > > > Yes, this can easily be done. > > > > Will you have a chance to do this? > > Done it locally, I'll try to take some time to commit that tonight.
Thanks. Although the provider name must not now be provided twice, I still hope that prepare_create_database() could take the new database name explicitly as a parameter. Also, it would be nice if the documentation for these methods stated whether it is necessary to first open a connection. I don't see how it could create a database without knowing the other connection details, such as hostname. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gnome-db-list mailing list gnome-db-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list