On Sun, Apr 6, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sun, 2008-04-06 at 18:49 +0200, Vivien Malerba wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 20:32 +0200, Vivien Malerba wrote: > > > > > > Thanks! This is the main goal of the V4 so I give it a lot of > care. > > > > > > Once it is stabilized and judged clean enough, I would like to > propose > > > > > > it for a Gnome module. > > > > > > > > > > In what release set? > > > > > > > > It depends... If I can have something stable enough, then I may try to > > > > propose it for 2.24 (before the 21st of April, see > > > > http://live.gnome.org/TwoPointTwentythree). Otherwise it willl be for > > > > 2.26... > > > > > > I mean, do you want to propose it for Platform, Desktop, Platform > > > Bindings (I guess not), Admin, or Developer Tools? > > > > I thougt about Platform since it's a library. > > OK. However, there is not much chance of this happening until something > in one of the other release sets uses it.
At least then people willing to write an application which needs a DB will have more chances of thinking about Libgda. Anyway, I think a DB library is really something which is needed alongside GTK+ (Qt has something even though it has less features). > > Also, the Platform should almost never break ABI. Are you really sure > that this version of libgda will never need another iteration? I certainly want it to be that way for V4; the API is noy yet finalized, and there are some features I want to be able to integrate in the future without needing to break the V4 API: * 2 phases commit * maybe (I'm not sure about that one) support for named transactions which can be shared between connections (Oracle does it). Vivien _______________________________________________ gnome-db-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
