On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 15:15 +0200, Johannes Schmid wrote: > Hi! > > I am currently working on the C++ bindings for libgda-4.0 but I am a bit > confused about the use of GdaValue. Most (if not all) external API uses > GValue instead of GdaValue now but GdaValue still seems to exist. > > Is GdaValue still necessary or is it just a left-over from the > conversion?
I don't think GdaValue really existed much in libgda-3.0 either. But we have a Gda::Value in libgdamm because it's difficult for us to offer nice API for the extra Gda GValue types otherwise. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gnome-db-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
