On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 21:27 +0100, Vivien Malerba wrote: > On 29 January 2010 21:25, Murray Cumming <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 21:21 +0100, Vivien Malerba wrote: > >> As a matter of fact both work, but you're right it's better to use > >> #include <sql-parser/gda-sql-parser.h>, I'll update the doc. > > > > Why is that better? It's part of libgda. I'm surprised that that works > > now. I think it worked in the past because the sql-parser headers were > > previously installed in the wrong place. > > > > It still works because I prefered to keep it that way to avoid forcing > people to update their code if they used #include > <libgda/sql-parser/gda-sql-parser.h>.
#include <libgda/sql-parser/gda-sql-parser.h> didn't work before. Now it does. Presumably nobody was using it before anyway. Why do you think that #include <sql-parser/gda-sql-parser.h> is better? -- [email protected] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gnome-db-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
