On Sun, 2010-06-13 at 16:14 +0200, Vivien Malerba wrote: > On 13 June 2010 14:59, Murray Cumming <[email protected]> wrote: > > May I make libgda-ui use GTK+ 3 instead of GTK+ 2? > > > > I don't think libgda-ui has had a stable release yet, so I don't see a > > need to change it's ABI name (.pc file, library name, includes > > directory, etc). > > > > As ever, I think things would be much simpler if libgda-ui was not in > > the same module as libgda. > > I know, but I already explained the design choices, and I don't want > to change this now. > > I was thinking about the following solution for the GTK3 change: > * create a branch for what will be the 4.2 version > * in master, change the requirements to GTK3 and associated libraries versions > * maintain both branches in sync with regards to evolutions > > when 4.2 is released, do a 4.2 to work with GTK2 a,d a 5.0 to work with GTK3
That sounds reasonable. However, unless that libgdaui-5.0 will be available for GNOME 3.0, it will require GNOME 3.0 to depend on both gtk+-2.0 and gtk+-3.0. -- [email protected] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gnome-db-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
