On 1 March 2011 10:36, Alexey Zakhlestin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 1, 2011 at 11:08 AM, Vivien Malerba <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > On 28 February 2011 21:56, Alexey Zakhlestin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Is there some table which lists status of different providers? > > > > Sure, see http://www.gnome-db.org/Providers_status > > > >> > >> I ask because I tried to use Postgres provider as backend for Midgard > >> content repository, today and bumped into limitation: > >> _gda_postgres_meta__enums is not implemented > > > > This is not a limitation, by a reminder that there is a missing feature. > In > > this case it's because recent versions of PostgreSQL feature enums, which > > are not currently analysed in the meta data extracted by Libgda (where > all > > the database objects are reported). This has no functionnal impact unless > of > > course you need to know all about the enums defined in your database; in > > this case adding this functionality is not very complicated. > > thanks. > > in Midgard we use a lot of metadata, so every bit counts. > for example, your table states that "MySQL 5.0.x" is fully functional, > but for us only 5.1.x+ works (maybe some latest 5.0.x also do, but > definitely not all of them) because 5.0.x doesn't provide enough > metadata > > at the moment, we test all our releases against SQLite and MySQL 5.1. > I just wonder which of other "providers" will work for us, and which won't >
If there are corrections to be made, I'll make them; all I need is a bug report (preferably bugzilla but mail is Ok). You're right that I never kept track of the exact versions of the database servers with which I test. In the meanwhile, I'll correct the text about MySQL to state that it works with 5.1 (as opposed to 5.0). Regards, Vivien
_______________________________________________ gnome-db-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
