On Mon, 2011-04-11 at 12:03 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > > > The PyGObject developers don't seem happy with this: > > > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647272#c2 > > > > I don't know why Libgda uses G_TYPE_INVALID instead of G_TYPE_NONE > > (some historical reason, lack of knowledge,...). > > > > > > > > Maybe it's something we can change in libgda-5.0. > > > > I guess that can be done, I have to check the impacts first. However I > > can't change the V4 behaviour, so for the GObject introspection, a > > solution needs to be found.
I've filed this bug here: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647633 It looks like we need a custom GDA_TYPE_NULL GType because G_TYPE_NONE can't be used with GValue: https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=647272#c4 -- [email protected] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gnome-db-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
