I'll take care about your patch and make sure to fix it ASAP.

2015-05-20 21:47 GMT-05:00 Alan Knowles <[email protected]>:

>  Not sure who is looking after this, but one bug I found was that all the
> errors are exported as enums rather than errordomains in libgda-5.0
> This is my hacky fix...
>
> https://github.com/roojs/app.Builder.js/blob/master/src/vapi/libgda-5.0.vapi#L1480
>
> this enables try/catch to work correctly in vala.
>
> Regards
> Alan
>
>
>
> On Friday, May 15, 2015 07:16 AM, Daniel Espinosa wrote:
>
>  Vivien,
>
>  I'd would like to see GDA 5.2 Vala bindings at valadoc.org, they have an
> old 4.0 version, then could you check way Rico states that: "The API
> isn't in sync between the ldap-provider and internal ldap-interface."
>
>  Rico, could you expand your explanation about "... g-ir-scanner seems to
> be caught in this LDAP stuff ...", in order to take a shot about, may be
> providing building messages output, please?
>
>   ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Rico Tzschichholz <[email protected]>
> Date: 2014-10-10 7:22 GMT-05:00
> Subject: Re: Gda bindings in vala-girs
> To: Daniel Espinosa <[email protected]>
>
>
> I send this again since I didn't receive an answer for the proposed
> changes.
>
>
> There is no real difference between vala 0.26 and master git yet.
> Vala is doing the right thing here apart from barfing about some
> characters in the gir.
>
> Although g-ir-scanner seems to be caught in this LDAP stuff. The API
> isn't in sync between the ldap-provider and internal ldap-interface.
>
> See
>
> https://git.gnome.org/browse/libgda/commit/?h=LIBGDA_5.2&id=6d02929e798ba6f71e9a6acde2c11f6c5c2dc996
>
> And this gmodule/dlopen mechanism is probably a problem too for g-i.
>
> I don't know why the "cnc" property still isn't picked up here.
>
> Am 01.10.2014 um 04:59 schrieb Daniel Espinosa:
> > I've used updated jhbuild to build GDA and Vala 0.26, stable from 0.26
> > branch.
> >
> > I see you use Vala 0.28, is this the way? Is not better to use stable
> > branches?
> >
> > In my box I found differences, attached, please review before to commit.
> >
> > 2014-09-30 8:29 GMT-05:00 Rico Tzschichholz <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>>:
> >
> >     Hi,
> >
> >     Yeah it is useful and wanted to use the latest available versions to
> >     generated these bindings to pick up bug-fixes and such. Purposely
> using
> >     valac 0.22 is not a good idea ;-)
> >
> >     I have pushed updates to catch up with the g-i changes.
> >     Besides that I added the needed configure-flags to have the needed
> files
> >     generated in jhbuild by default.
> >
> >
> https://git.gnome.org/browse/jhbuild/commit/?id=a5b7742150c0debe89f6640f7e9351859f8d1a02
> >
> >     This way it will get updated in the progress of our/my usual jhbuild
> >     update of girs/vapis.
> >
> >     Regards,
> >     Rico
> >
> >     Am 30.09.2014 um 15:17 schrieb Daniel Espinosa:
> >     > Thanks forma your advise :-)
> >     >
> >     > I would like to maintain this files because I'm the maintainer in
> >     > libgda. I've used 0.22, because is that version  available when
> 5.2 was
> >     > realized; I'm using 5.2 branch too.
> >     >
> >     > Then valadoc.org <http://valadoc.org> <http://valadoc.org> policy
> >     is to use latest version of
> >     > vala and GObject Introspection?
> >     >
> >     > If so, we need to use non released distribution, use jhbuild or
> wait and
> >     > update my box to latest distribution using GNOME 3.14 now a days.
> >     >
> >     > El sep 30, 2014 3:17 AM, "Rico Tzschichholz" <[email protected]
> <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     > <mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>> escribió:
>  >     >
> >     >     Hi,
> >     >
> >     >     I noticed your commit/merge to vala-girs. Your build
> >     environment seems
> >     >     to be pretty outdated and therefore your reverted quite a lot
> >     of changes
> >     >     in Gda-5.0.gir. If you are pushing things there make sure you
> >     are using
> >     >     an up2date system since e.g. valac-0.22, which you used, is
> >     quite old.
> >     >
> >     >     I am going to update the related files based on "LIBGDA_5.2"
> >     branch
> >     >     https://git.gnome.org/browse/libgda/log/?h=LIBGDA_5.2
> >     >
> >     >     Regards,
> >     >     Rico
> >     >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Trabajar, la mejor arma para tu superación
> > "de grano en grano, se hace la arena" (R) (en trámite, pero para los
> > cuates: LIBRE)
>
>
>
>
> --
> Trabajar, la mejor arma para tu superación
> "de grano en grano, se hace la arena" (R) (en trámite, pero para los
> cuates: LIBRE)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-db-list mailing 
> [email protected]https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> gnome-db-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list
>
>


-- 
Trabajar, la mejor arma para tu superación
"de grano en grano, se hace la arena" (R) (en trámite, pero para los
cuates: LIBRE)
_______________________________________________
gnome-db-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-db-list

Reply via email to