On Wed, 2005-06-08 at 00:40 +0200, Christian Rose wrote: > I'm afraid the current branch name will be very confusing to many > contributors, not at least translators, who work with many modules at > the same time and rely on branches being named consistently. > Understood.
> The policy (http://developer.gnome.org/dotplan/for_maintainers.html) is > that the branch name should indicate the stable GNOME release the branch > is targeted at, which means the *latest* stable GNOME release the branch > is targeted at, if it is supposed to cover many stable releases. > Noone will never ever (hopefully) release a new version of GNOME 2.8, > however naming a new branch "gnome-2-8" implies that you're working > towards such a release, which I'm sure isn't the case. However, the > branch name still indicates that. > > So yes, if you could find a way to create a stable branch with the > standard name "gnome-2-10", it would be *much* appreciated. > There is now also a gnome-2-10 branch which will be used for the next stable release, should the need arise. -Gary _______________________________________________ gnome-doc-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
