Hi Shaun, On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 14:34 -0600, Shaun McCance wrote: > On Mon, 2005-12-05 at 18:39 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
> > I'd be very glad if anyone "in the know" about gnome-doc-utils could > > verify that the porting has been done right. > > Hi Emmanuele, > > I grabbed gnome-utils from CVS and checked it over. I don't seem > to be able to compile gnome-utils on this machine at the moment, > probably because I'm missing some new development goodness. But > I can run autogen/configure (which might mean your configure checks > aren't strict enough). There was a problem with my last commit - but now it should be fixed. > Anyway, I was able to run make and make check in all three help > directories. I manually looked over your source and build files, > as well as the files gnome-doc-utils generates, and everything > really looks fine. If make distcheck passes for you, then you > probably have everything right. The gnome-doc-utils stuff is > very strict about check and distcheck. I had to add the 'm4' directory to EXTRA_DIST inside the top-level Makefile.am, otherwise distcheck would fail; I've added a warning for this on the MigrationHowto wiki page, since it might easily be forgotten, especially by people without great auto-fu like myself :-). Anyway, now gnome-utils compiles fine and passes check && distcheck. Thanks! Ciao, Emmanuele. -- Emmanuele Bassi - <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Log: http://log.emmanuelebassi.net _______________________________________________ gnome-doc-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gnome-doc-list
